B: Return to Sender.
But what's ironic about "Return to Sender - Insufficient Postage" is that it involves more effort on the part of the Postal Service than to simply deliver the thing.
Too funny Leigh. Very true. However, they do it to teach dumb blokes a lesson. Oh wait that's me.
i like the logo they use in the "returned to sender" stamp. It's a hand pointing. If the owner of that hand were to speak, they would be saying "tsk. tsk. shame on you" and the hand would be animated in a short waving pattern.
Though I don't know if it's actually worth it to get a tatoo that large on your hand that says "returned to sender".
Or did the owner of this hand have his/her hand detached and sent through the mail? And the hand didn't have sufficient postage or improper addressing so it was sent back to owner with the "returned to sender" tattoo added? If that's the case, then wouldn't the tattoo be of a hand with the "returned to sender" phrase instead of just the phrase on its own? It's like the old saying, "which came first? the chicken or the egg?" And if you're going to mail your own hand, wouldn't you darn well make sure that you had the correct address written on it with sufficient postage? C'mon!
I'm going to assume that the hand belongs to a woman because the finger nails are so long.
here's the stamp i am speaking of:
http://www.istockphoto.com/file_thumbview_approve/240346/2/istockphoto_240346_Returned_to_Sender_Stamp.jpg
So....... what happened?
