The blog filled with creative thoughts
<< The Ultimate Freetranslation Cycle  |   WEBLOG  |   Eggspensive eggs? >>
ARCHIVES

A dummies guide to Tibet, written by a dummy


(Image courtesy Taekwonweirdo via Creative Commons license)

Huh?
Protesters march down Chicago’s Michigan Avenue. I look out my 14th floor window in the Tribune Tower to see banners saying “Free Tibet.”

Tibet? Honestly, I have no idea what Tibet is about. Heck I don’t even know where Tibet is. It just sounds like some cute country. After a little bit of internet research, here's what I found:

A summary about Tibet:
Tibet has been ruled by China for 10 centuries. But China never really did anything with the area. They just kinda let it hang out and have the Dalai Lama govern the area. Tibet did try to declare their sovereignty in the early 20th century. From wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tibet:

Tibet proclaimed its independence from China in 1911, right before the fall of the Qing government. However, "at no time did any western power come out in favor of its independence or grant it diplomatic recognition.”[4] The People's Republic of China (PRC), citing historical records and the Seventeen Point Agreement signed by the Tibetan government in 1951, claims Tibet as a part of China (with a small part, depending on definitions, controlled by India). Currently every country in the world recognizes China's sovereignty over Tibet.
Then in 1950 China invaded Tibet after the Communists come to power. They decided to show everyone they truly own Tibet. The Tibetan army destroyed in battle at Chamdo. In 1966 all religious practice is outlawed, over 4000 monasteries are destroyed, and monks are either imprisoned or "re-educated."

My interpretation:
The violence from China is definitely wrong, and worthy of protest. But China does technically own the land. Kinda sucks. It's like when someone owns an old house. They don't do anything with it and leave it rot and decay. Then you get someone who moves in and decides to actually do something with the house, then the owner is like, "heyyy! what are you doing!? This is MY house!" So they decided to beat everyone up, and totally trash the house.

With China's violent actions towards Tibet, you got people wanting Tibet to be free. They kinda have a case as the Tibetan army, led by British-trained officers, defeated Chinese army in 1918. Tibet and China signed a peace treaty; but China refused to ratify treaty. China has always "ruled" the area. Sometimes they let Tibet do their own thing, sometimes they slam their fist down. Should Tibet be its own country? I don't know.

Please correct me if I'm wrong about any of these statements. I'm just a newbie who always thought Tibet just sounded like a cute name.

Other sources:
http://www.freetibet.org/info/facts/fact18.html
http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-71442/Tibet
Atlanta Journal-Constitution's Timeline of Tibet


Posted by: spudart on Mar 28, 08 | 5:00 am | Profile
[567] Hits  | | permalink  | [0] Trackbacks  | [0] Pingbacks

"HONK for TIBET"? Really? That is the silliest sign I have ever seen in my life.

Posted by: unlikelymoose on Mar 28, 08 | 8:28 am


well the same could be said about Serbia and Kosovo....

Posted by: Fred on Mar 28, 08 | 8:50 am


Because honking will make Tibet free.

I say let's make Tibet free. If China is ruling the land so badly, then they don't deserve it. It's kinda like when America became free from the land of Britain.

Posted by: spudart on Mar 28, 08 | 10:01 am


Did anyone see the story on Kosovo/Serbia on Chicago Tonight this week?

I don't know when honking for something ever solved a problem. I guess peoplel still believe that it will, but it's not like some authority is sitting their counting honks and waiting for some magical number to occur before they will move on an issue.

Posted by: Tom on Mar 28, 08 | 11:34 am


Same could be said for petitions ... like some politician is going to say "oh wow, look, a million people signed this petition, i better do something". If he hadn't heard about the issue before then, it's probably not all that important to him.

Posted by: Abhay on Apr 03, 08 | 4:43 pm


Let's flip the script and say the state of Illinois wanted to be a "free" state from the USA, would we allow it? Would our government allow it? Never. Would our government intervene? You bet. Same concept.

Posted by: Nolan on Apr 11, 08 | 4:15 pm


Nolan! Slamming down the sickle of China!

Posted by: spudart on Apr 11, 08 | 4:33 pm


The main problem with your analogy, Nolan, is that America hasn't imprisoned peaceful protestors Illinois. America hasn't imprisoned Illinois writers. America hasn't destroyed monasteries. America hasn't violated human rights in Illinois on a large scale. If America were doing those things to the people of Illinois, then perhaps Illinois would have a reason to separate from America.

Posted by: spudart on Apr 11, 08 | 9:31 pm


Please leave a comment below:
Name
Email (You don't have to put a real email address here. But if you want to be notified when someone adds a comment to this post, then put in your real email address here and check the "Notify me..." box below)
Homepage (not necessary)
Your Comments


Show my email address
Remember me
Notify me when someone replies to this post

Submit the word you see below:




*Name and Email address are required
Welcome
Hi. I'm Matt Maldre. Every single weekday my blog on spudart.org has a new post with an original idea or discovery. Be sure to stop by daily to see what's happening.



for sale
Buy some art
Chicago Police II - print at deviantart.com

mailing list
Get new spudart posts once a day:

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Subscription Center
Subscribe via RSS
Add to Google Reader
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My AOL
Add to My AOL
Add to My MSN
Add to My MSN
Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Add to NewsGator
Add to Bloglines
Add to Bloglines

art | design | illustration | photo | thoughts blog | other stuff
===== Spudart Productions: Sprouting out creativity =====
about spudart | contact | sales | links | guestbook | site map