Blog

e-ink to revolutionize how you read


Ever print out an article because it’s too hard to read the entire thing on screen? Would you like to be able to read your articles on one piece of paper that can just magically change its ink? This does exist, and it’s called e-ink.

e-ink is as thin as a sheet of paper and it’s embedded with millions of tiny balls. Each of these balls has one side that is white, the other is black. The sheet they are embedded in has an electronic charge that tells the balls which way to face. So with one push of a button all the balls can line up to form an article. Or a black/white photograph. Since they don’t emit light, they are easy to read. It’s literally like reading ink on paper.

Plus when you are reading an article, there is no energy used to keep it on, because the balls just sit in their spot. The only energy used is to change the balls position–like when you change pages. There’s a lot of stuff this e-ink can be used for and tomorrow I will cover the new ebook reading device called the Sony Librie.

Happening right now on Spudart: Press a leaf in an envelope with the date and story written on it until 2026-10-31

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

8 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Tom Saaristo
21 years ago

I can’t get my brain around this concept!

laura k.
laura k.
21 years ago

wow!

l.wells
21 years ago

i saw this at the museum of science and industry a while back, its really cool. before you know it we will be reading (or watching) animated newspapers.

l.wells
21 years ago

oh, hi

Tom Saaristo
21 years ago

Animated newspapers like in Minority Report!

Tom Saaristo
21 years ago

I think the technology for animated newspapers isn’t too far off [a la Minority Report”> and I don’t think it will require using electricity in the way we do now: plugs. But still, for some reason I have a better time getting my thoughts around something that doesn’t exist than I do with e-ink which does exist! Am I just stupid?