Blog

IDEA: Library borrower status levels

How can this be? The Chicago Public Library classifies my borrower status as “good.” I’ve had so many late books and lost books, that I am a large benefactor to keeping the library’s budget balanced.

What sort of levels of borrower status do they have? Is it just “good” and “delinquent”? Here’s the structure I suggest they have:

1) Perfect: Oh yeah, you know there’s gotta be people out there with a perfect borrowing record. And you can only get this if you have taken out over 50 books. Oh wait. Let’s break that up into: Perfect Newbie (for those who have taken out just a couple books) and Perfect Veteran.

2) Great

3) Good

4) Unreliable

5) Crappy

6) Delinquent Master

7) Banned

Oh you know the Chicago Public Library has GOTTA have a “Banned” status.

Happening right now on Spudart: Press a leaf in an envelope with the date and story written on it until 2026-10-31

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

7 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Kelly (KH)
Kelly (KH)
19 years ago

You had to know I’d be one of the first to reply to this one! If CPL is anything like other public systems, it doesn’t really keep records of your borrowing history (it’s a privacy issue). So, you either have good standing or you don’t — in the electronic records. I don’t remember hearing about “banned” patrons from the public library, just the university library (at my old job). However, the people who work there might have their own internal chatting about you. Like, “Oh, here comes that guy who never returns his stuff on time.” I like the 7-point system though. 🙂

Kristina Jarosik
Kristina Jarosik
19 years ago

An interesting entry. . . I’ve had quite the experience with CPL. I too think they should track your borrowing history and reward you if you acheive status number 1 & 2 as suggested by spud. WHY? Well I’m taking a grad class and have had to do some research on Chicago history. CPL has oodles of books. Unfortunately to combat those folks who lose or don’t return the books, they have taken to making 7 copies of the same book reference. This is a standard practice for books on Chicago history at CPL. ugh!!! I tried vocalizing my disdain for this policy with the reference librarian on staff and commented that I have never lost a CPL book and have no outstanding fines. They should have a separate policy regarding these popular books for those with exemplary records. The CPL librarian replied to my comments “Well if you left today with this book and got hit by a car and died, we would never get the book back.” Without missing a beat, I replied “My library and book lovin’ mother would ensure you’d get the book back. That’s why I have an exemplary borrowing record in the first place.” No further comments were exchanged, and I walked away sad that the public library fails to allow the public to borrow books on the city’s history.